Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State

LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 19, 2010 · Crenshaw, Kelly, LaROSE
29 So. 3d 1220; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3610; 2010 WL 985604 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Raul Liranzo-Cruzata appeals the denial of his motion to mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), as well as an order denying a motion to disqualify the successor judge who ruled on the motion. The denial of a motion to mitigate a sentence is not ap-pealable, Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); accordingly that aspect of this appeal is dismissed. However, the denial of the motion to disqualify the successor judge is reviewable under this court’s jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.