Edwards v. State
Edwards v. State
35 So. 3d 121; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934; 2010 WL 1979275
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Edwards v. State
Opinion
The defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. We affirm. A Rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the conviction. See Prince v. State, 903 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.