Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

KM v. Department of Children and Families

KM v. Department of Children and Families
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 25, 2010 · Orfinger, Lawson, Jacobus
42 So. 3d 345; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12536; 2010 WL 3359415 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

KM v. Department of Children and Families

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

K.M., the mother of L.B., appeals an order terminating her parental rights. 1 K.M. is proceeding pro se. 2 We have carefully considered K.M.’s arguments and thoroughly reviewed the record. Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
1

. The father's parental rights were terminated in the same order. The father had tendered and the trial court accepted his surrender of all parental rights to L.B.

2

. The mother proceeds pro se because her court-appointed attorney withdrew on the ground that a thorough, conscientious, and good faith review showed no meritorious grounds on which to base an appeal, citing N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 843 So.2d 898 (Fla. 2003). Otherwise, the mother at all times was represented by court-appointed counsel.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑