We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence. The prosecutor’s isolated statement concerning the law, which was arguably a misstatement, followed by the trial court’s proper instructions to the jury with respect to the law does not constitute grounds for reversal. See Lugo v. State, 845 So.2d 74, 108-109 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 920, 124 S.Ct. 320, 157 L.Ed.2d 216 (2003); Cabrera v. State, 490 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Fennie v. State, 855 So.2d 597, 609 (Fla. 2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 975, 124 S.Ct. 1877, 158 L.Ed.2d 471 (2004).

AFFIRMED.