Aikens v. State
Aikens v. State
25 So. 3d 1283; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520; 2010 WL 289102
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Aikens v. State
Opinion
Affirmed.
The claim was time-barred, see Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In addition, under the facts of this case, the erroneous use of “and/or” in the jury instruction did not constitute fundamental error, see Garzon v. State, 980 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 2008).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.