Davis v. State
Davis v. State
25 So. 3d 1282; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 529; 2010 WL 289184
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Davis v. State
Concurring Opinion
(concurring).
The sole issue raised on this direct appeal from conviction and sentence is the claim that trial counsel was ineffective and that this can be determined from the face of the record. The majority opinion affirms without prejudice to the appellant to file a postconviction motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so stating we are not, of course, expressing any opinion on the merits of any motion that the appellant may file.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s raising a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in an appropriate Rule 3.850 motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.