Nichols v. State
Nichols v. State
32 So. 3d 718; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Nichols v. State
Opinion
The appellant challenges the sentences entered upon his revocation of probation. The state correctly concedes that, because his original sentences were concurrent, the appellant is entitled to credit for time served on each of the consecutive sentences to which he was resentenced. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to award credit for time served to each sentence. See State v. Rabedeau, 2 So.3d 191, 193 (Fla. 2009).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.