Alexander v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Alexander v. State, 32 So. 3d 716 (2010)
2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5102; 2010 WL 1329828
Stevenson, Damoorgian

Alexander v. State

Opinion

*717 PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. Appellate counsel is not deficient for failing to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal. Suarez v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 190, 193 (Fla. 1988); Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1987). With extremely limited exceptions, the appropriate place to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, not on direct appeal. “Appellate counsel cannot be faulted for preserving the more effective remedy and eschewing the less effective.” Blanco, 507 So.2d at 1384.

STEVENSON, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ„ concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ronald ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published