Scholtes v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Scholtes v. State, 27 So. 3d 175 (2010)
2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091; 2010 WL 366603
Gross, Stevenson, Levine

Scholtes v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
1

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Reference

Full Case Name
Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published