Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

Scholtes v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 3, 2010 · No. 4D07-3690 · Gross, Stevenson, Levine

27 So. 3d 175; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091; 2010 WL 366603 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Ruiz v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.