Scholtes v. State
Scholtes v. State
27 So. 3d 175; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1091; 2010 WL 366603
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Scholtes v. State
Opinion
Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.
1
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.