Bacallao v. State
Bacallao v. State
41 So. 3d 988; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11274; 2010 WL 3023275
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Bacallao v. State
Opinion
The denial of Appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed without prejudice to the extent Appellant is challenging the Florida Parole Commission’s determination of his release date. Appellant may file a proper petition in the appropriate jurisdiction. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 720 So .2d 216, 217 (Fla. 1998) (“[A Petition for Writ of] Mandamus is an accepted remedy for reviewing an order of the Florida Parole Commission.”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.