Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

Falco v. State

Falco v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 15, 2010 · No. 4D09-4577 · Levine, Polen, Warner
44 So. 3d 198; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625; 2010 WL 3564732 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Falco v. State

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.