RP v. Department of Children and Families
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- O. T. v. Florida Department of Children & Families (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
- J.F.S. v. Department of Children & Families (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- B.B. v. Department of Children & Families (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We affirm the lower court’s order that terminated the parental rights of Appellant, rejecting the contentions that the evidence was insufficient to support termination and that termination was not the least restrictive means of protecting the child. We have specifically addressed the merits of the insufficiency argument, notwithstanding Appellee’s protestation that this argument was not preserved. In doing so, we align ourselves with the Fourth District’s decision in H.D. v. Department of Children & Families, 964 So.2d 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We acknowledge apparent conflict with J.D. v. Department of Children & Families, 825 So.2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.