Johnson v. State
Johnson v. State
49 So. 3d 321; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18196; 2010 WL 4740413
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Johnson v. State
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion for return of property is affirmed for reasons other than those given by the trial court. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient. See Almeda v. State, 959 So.2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.