Brinson v. State
Brinson v. State
Opinion
David Brinson, Jr., challenges his robbery sentence, which was imposed upon resentencing after reversal of his violent career criminal (VCC) sentence. See Brinson v. State, 995 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). We affirm Brinson’s sentence without comment. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error which appears on the face of the judgment. The written judgment correctly reflects that Brinson was convicted of a second-degree felony, but it incorrectly identifies that felony as armed robbery, which is actually a first-degree felony. See § 810.02(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). Accordingly, we remand with instructions that the trial court correct the written judgment to reflect that Brinson was convicted of the second-degree felony of robbery. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.