Harris v. State
Harris v. State
36 So. 3d 882; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7713; 2010 WL 2217237
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Harris v. State
Opinion of the Court
Michael Carl Harris appeals his judgment and sentence for delivery of cocaine. He argues that the State failed to prove the element of knowledge. We affirm. When person # 1 asks person # 2 for crack cocaine, person # 2 directs person # 3 to hand over a substance, and person # 3 hands over a substance that later tests
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.