Nasiff v. State
Nasiff v. State
43 So. 3d 150; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728; 2010 WL 3418278
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Nasiff v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant’s claim; rather, we conclude that appellant’s claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.