Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

Nasiff v. State

Nasiff v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 1, 2010 · Gerber, Glenn, Hazouri, Kelley
43 So. 3d 150; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728; 2010 WL 3418278 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Nasiff v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant’s claim; rather, we conclude that appellant’s claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, GERBER, JJ., and KELLEY, GLENN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.