Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

Pierce v. Pierce

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 7, 2010 · No. 1D10-1872 · Benton, Clark, Davis

46 So. 3d 606; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13322; 2010 WL 3465253 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pierce v. Pierce (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 8, 2010, the Court has determined that the order on appeal, which denied a motion to enforce a mediated settlement agreement and set aside the agreement upon determining it was signed under duress, is not one which finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a *607probate matter. Thus, the order is not subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions are denied as moot.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.