Robinson v. State
Robinson v. State
48 So. 3d 1031; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18664; 2010 WL 4962864
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Robinson v. State
Opinion of the Court
Both appellant and the state agree that the circuit court committed fundamental error when, after a non-jury trial, it entered judgments of conviction for both organized fraud and grand theft. We reverse and remand to the circuit court to vacate the conviction for grand theft and resentence appellant for organized fraud. See Pizzo v. State, 945 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 2006); Newton v. State, 31 So.3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Pineda v. State, 3 So.3d 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.