Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

Rowe v. Duetche Bank National Trust Co.

Rowe v. Duetche Bank National Trust Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 28, 2010 · Marstiller, Padovano, Roberts
49 So. 3d 1285; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20232; 2010 WL 5306529 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Rowe v. Duetche Bank National Trust Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Contending that the trial court failed to rule on her properly served motion for disqualification within 30 days as required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(j), petitioner seeks mandamus relief *1286in the form of an order compelling the lower tribunal clerk to reassign her case. Although the parties have stipulated to granting the relief sought, petitioner fails to show that, as contemplated by the rule, she has sought an order from the trial court directing the clerk to reassign the case. Making such a demand is required in order to establish an entitlement to this court’s intervention by writ of mandamus. See KKP Holdings, LLC v. Russell, 1 So.3d 1287 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); see also Harrison v. Johnson, 934 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (denying mandamus relief where petitioner had failed to bring motion for reassignment before the trial court in order to obtain a ruling). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED as premature.

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.