Austin v. State
Austin v. State
74 So. 3d 1119; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17783; 2011 WL 5375019
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Austin v. State
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s post-conviction motion except as to the claim involving counsel’s failure to call witness Sullivan at trial. This claim is legally sufficient and requires an evidentiary hearing. We remand for further proceedings on this claim only. We affirm the denial of the motion in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.