Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

SAFFERFIELD v. State

SAFFERFIELD v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 25, 2011 · Clark, Roberts, Thomas
73 So. 3d 319; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829; 2011 WL 5057091 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

SAFFERFIELD v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus, to the extent it challenges pretrial actions by counsel and the trial judge, is premature because those issues can be raised on appeal from final judgment. The petition is therefore denied in part. Insofar as the petition complains of former counsel’s failure to provide petitioner with records upon request, the petition is also denied but without prejudice to petitioner’s right to seek relief in circuit court. See Dumas v. *320 Marrero, 864 So.2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

PETITION DENIED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.