Mann v. State
Mann v. State
62 So. 3d 1240; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8896; 2011 WL 2342512
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Mann v. State
Opinion
We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.