Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Schultheis v. State

Schultheis v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 26, 2011 · Van Nortwick, Wetherell, Rowe
65 So. 3d 1184; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574; 2011 WL 3055730 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Schultheis v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Todd Schultheis appeals the order denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The State concedes the case must be reversed because the trial court failed to set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law either on the record or in its order denying post-conviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d) (“If an evidentiary hearing is required, the court shall ... determine the issues, and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto.”); Thomas v. State, 954 So.2d 56, 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“[T]he trial court erred by failing to make any findings of fact — either orally or in writing.”); see also Kornegay v. State, 826 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.