Lambert v. State
Lambert v. State
65 So. 3d 1139; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11349; 2011 WL 2848553
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Lambert v. State
Opinion
In this appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s ruling on his claims for postconviction relief and the amended sentencing order. We affirm, but remand for the entry of a corrected order of revocation that reflects a violation of only condition 5. See, e.g., Ortiz v. State, 2 So.3d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (recognizing that written order of revocation must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement).
Affirmed and Remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.