Young v. State
Young v. State
66 So. 3d 1076; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12386; 2011 WL 3464321
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Young v. State
Opinion
The appellant is appealing an order in which the trial court struck the appellant’s postconviction claims as facially insufficient and, in accordance with Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007), granted the appellant thirty days to amend. The order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.