Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Halawy v. Halawy

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 26, 2011 · Silberman, Casanueva, Dakan, Stephen

67 So. 3d 447; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423; 2011 WL 3760859 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nazih and Thelma Halawy, the parties in this long-term marriage, had a child who was still a minor when their dissolution of marriage action commenced. In a nonfinal child support order, the trial court imputed minimum wage income to each parent. Mr. Halawy appeals this nonfinal child support order, 1 contending that the trial court erred in requiring him to pay the entire amount despite the fact that the trial court imputed equal income to each of them. 2

Mrs. Halawy concedes the error and we agree. 3 We reverse and remand for correction of this error in the order on child support. 4

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

*448 SILBERMAN, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L„ ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii).

. Mr. Halawy raises a second issue which we decline to consider inasmuch as it is not within our jurisdiction at this time.

. See § 61.30(9), (10), Fla. Stat. (2009).

.Mrs. Halawy further notes that there may be a computational error in the amount of total child support due. On remand, the circuit court shall also consider this claim before entering the final judgment, which should also include a finding and order on alimony due, if any.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.