Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Ortiz v. State

Ortiz v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 3, 2011 · Sawaya, Torpy, Evander
62 So. 3d 684; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8148; 2011 WL 2162049 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Ortiz v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Smith v. State, 59 So.3d 1107 (Fla. 2011), (juror’s surname, without more, is insufficient to trigger inquiry as to whether strike was exercised for discriminatory reason); Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla. 2007) (preservation of challenge to potential juror requires more than one objection; when trial court denies or grants peremptory challenge, objecting party must renew and reserve objection béfore jury is sworn).

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.