Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Stacey v. State

Stacey v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 8, 2011 · Griffin, Monaco, Torpy
83 So. 3d 749; 2011 WL 2650875; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10649 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Stacey v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; trafficking in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; possession of listed chemical; and tampering with physical evidence. On each of these counts the circumstantial proof was sufficient to support the jury verdict. Based upon double jeopardy grounds, we vacate the conviction and sentence for manufacture of methamphetamine. Ford v. State, 749 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑