Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 4, 2011 · Evander, Jacobus, Monaco
53 So. 3d 391; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1082; 2011 WL 335571 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Richardson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Richardson’s Rule 3.800(a)1 motion without prejudice to Richardson’s right to seek additional jail credit pursuant to a legally sufficient motion. See Alfonso v. State, 901 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.