Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Balladares v. State

Balladares v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 6, 2011 · Emas, Schwartz, Shepherd
57 So. 3d 992; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4799; 2011 WL 1262158 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Balladares v. State

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

While defendant’s convictions are affirmed, the defendant argues, the State concedes,' and we agree, that the concurrent sentences imposed below upon him as a (properly designated) Prison Releasee Reoffender, § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (2008), of thirty years for strong arm robbery, a second degree felony, and ten years for tampering with a witness, a third degree felony, are unlawfully excessive. The trial court’s apparent reliance on the habitual felony offender statute which would permit this sentence, § 775.084, Fla. Stat. (2008), was, as all agree, unjustified because, although the defendant may have qualified for that status, the trial court did not so declare him or otherwise comply with the requirements of the statute.

Therefore the sentences are vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing without regard to the habitual felony offender statute.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.