Appellant challenges the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion. He claims that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. As the State points out, Appellant’s sentence does not exceed the maximum sentence if it was properly reclassified based upon a jury finding that he used a weapon during the commission of the crime. Based upon the limited record before us, we cannot tell whether the jury made the necessary finding. The trial judge did not attach portions of the record to refute the claim. Accordingly, as the State properly concedes, reversal is necessary with instruction for the trial court to grant the relief or attach the proper records to refute the claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.