Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Perez v. State

Perez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 27, 2011 · Lagoa, Ramirez, Salter
60 So. 3d 511; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960; 2011 WL 1563279 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Perez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Sinclair, 995 So.2d 621, 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In order to establish prejudice as a result of the failure to advise a defendant of the deportation consequences of a plea, ‘[t]he burden is on the movant to establish that the plea in the case under attack is the only basis for deportation. Only then can the movant show prejudice resulting from the failure to advise of deportation consequences in the case under attack.’ ” (quoting Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (emphasis added in original))).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.