Sotero v. Sullivan
Sotero v. Sullivan
60 So. 3d 512; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5953; 2011 WL 1562896
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Sotero v. Sullivan
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Marylynn Sotero appeals from a January 4, 2011, non-final order appointing a co-parenting therapist. Appellant contends that the order improperly, and without Appellant’s consent:
1. Delegates to the therapist the authority to make binding decisions regarding the minor child;
2. Delegates to the therapist the authority to impose monetary sanctions upon the parents;
3. Waives the confidentiality of Appellant’s communications with the co-parenting therapist; and
4. Waives Appellant’s psychotherapist-patient privilege as to communications with her own individual therapist.
Upon Appellee’s “Notice of Intent Not to File Answer Brief and Consent to Order Being Vacated” (which we treat as a confession of error), we vacate the order and remand this cause to the trial court for
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.