Whitney v. Hill
Whitney v. Hill
61 So. 3d 482; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252; 2011 WL 1899518
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Whitney v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
In this legal malpractice action, Attorney Max Whitney appeals the amended final judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellee, Dr. Michael Hill. Whitney’s claims of error are without merit and, therefore, we affirm the final judgment. However, we remand for correction of a mathematical error in the award of attorney’s fees in the final judgment. The award amount should be $17,875 rather than $18,875.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of mathematical error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.