Fipps v. State
Fipps v. State
68 So. 3d 365; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13235; 2011 WL 3677079
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Fipps v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. We find the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. The State failed to provide sufficient evidence identifying appellant as the second perpetrator of the burglary. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions that appellant be discharged.
REVERSED AND REMANDED, with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.