Arango v. State
Arango v. State
72 So. 3d 339; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987; 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Arango v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm James Arango’s conviction and sentence for organized fraud. But, as conceded by the State, we must reverse the restitution awards that were entered after Arango filed his notice of appeal, which divested the trial court of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Renfroe v. State, 20 So.3d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). On remand, the court may revisit the issue of restitution.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.