Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Vreeland v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 19, 2011 · Benton, Nortwick, Swanson

72 So. 3d 802; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16561; 2011 WL 4953417 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Nino Chet Tartarini v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Covington v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion seeking the appointment of counsel for postconviction purposes is not among the class of orders appealable by a defendant pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling by the circuit court on appellant’s pending motion(s) requesting that he be granted relief from his conviction.

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.