Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 31, 2011 · Davis, Nortwick, Rowe
73 So. 3d 339; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17242; 2011 WL 5120223 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Criollo v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.