Young v. State
Young v. State
73 So. 3d 825; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16752; 2011 WL 5109533
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Young v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the defendant’s convictions for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a dangerous weapon and for carjacking with a weapon. We certify conflict with Munoz v. State, 937 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.