Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 9, 2011 · Davis, Kelly, Larose
75 So. 3d 821; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19764; 2011 WL 6116453 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Mandujano-Jiminez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in posteonviction proceedings and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great pub-*822lie importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

DAVIS, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ„ Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.