Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2011

Gielchinsky v. Swartz

Gielchinsky v. Swartz
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 30, 2011 · Emas, Shepherd, Wells
76 So. 3d 345; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19043; 2011 WL 5964342 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Gielchinsky v. Swartz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“[T]he record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”); Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(e) (stating the burden to ensure the record is supplied and transmitted shall be on the appellant).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.