Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris
Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris
82 So. 3d 928; 2011 WL 2694562; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris
Opinion of the Court
We affirm, in part, the second amended final judgment post mandate on rehearing. We reverse that portion of the final judgment failing to award appellant prejudgment interest. We remand to the circuit court to enter an award of prejudgment interest from the date that appellant filed its counterclaim. See Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Constr. Corp., 560 So.2d 804, 804-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest to appellee. See Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp., 55 So.3d 567, 575 (Fla. 2010).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.