Thompson v. State
Thompson v. State
80 So. 3d 1109; 2012 WL 591508; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2896
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Thompson v. State
Opinion
We affirm Thompson’s conviction without prejudice to Thompson to timely seek postconviction relief challenging the trial court’s imposition of a 25-year minimum mandatory term. See Dunbar v. State, 35 So.3d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (sentencing errors that occur after effective date of amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), even if formerly deemed fundamental or patent on face of record, cannot be reviewed by appellate court if issue is not raised at sentencing or in timely post-sentencing proceeding pursuant to rule 3.800); see also Williams v. State, 56 So.3d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.