KULO v. State
KULO v. State
83 So. 3d 979; 2012 WL 966632; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4571
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
KULO v. State
Opinion
We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.