Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

KULO v. State

KULO v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 23, 2012 · Palmer, Monaco, Torpy
83 So. 3d 979; 2012 WL 966632; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4571 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

KULO v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.