LAURITO v. State
LAURITO v. State
83 So. 3d 980; 2012 WL 966568; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
LAURITO v. State
Opinion
Although the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, it failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by rule 3.850(d). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause with instructions that the trial court make the required findings. Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla. 2004).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.