Santos v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Santos v. State, 79 So. 3d 112 (2012)
2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 521; 2012 WL 127244
Warner, Polen, Damoorgian

Santos v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm with prejudice the summary denial of appellant’s untimely postconviction motion. The alleged “newly discovered evidence,” that jury selection was not transcribed for the direct appeal in 1994, could have been discovered with due diligence within the two-year time limit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1).

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael SANTOS A/K/A Michael Minasian, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published