Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Santos v. State

Santos v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 18, 2012 · Warner, Polen, Damoorgian
79 So. 3d 112; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 521; 2012 WL 127244 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Santos v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm with prejudice the summary denial of appellant’s untimely postconviction motion. The alleged “newly discovered evidence,” that jury selection was not transcribed for the direct appeal in 1994, could have been discovered with due diligence within the two-year time limit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1).

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.