Acosta v. State

Affirmed. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla. 2001) (holding “the adjudication of a defendant as a habitual offender when the requisite ... felonies do not exist may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a) so long as the error is apparent from the face of the record”); accord Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).