Star Funding Solutions, LLC v. Krondes
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- & SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & The Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. (Fla. 2016)
- Armstrong v. U.S. Bank National Association (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2024)
- Wells Fargo v. Duda (N.M. Ct. App. 2021)
- Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. LHF Hudson, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. LHF Hudson, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC. v. VERO VENTURES, LLC. etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. and the Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. and Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. – Corrected Opinion (Fla. 2017)
- Green v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2017)
- HSBC Bank Mortgage Corp. (USA) v. Lees (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robinson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Deutsche Bank v. Beauvais (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Bartram (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- Evergrene Partners, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- 2010-3 SFR Venture, LLC v. Garcia (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. Neal (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
- Kaan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Star Funding Solutions, LLC, appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to vacate the order dismissing with prejudice its foreclosure action against John and Florence Krondes, and others. We affirm and write only to address the impact of the dismissal with prejudice on any subsequent act of default of the terms of the mortgage between Star Funding and the Krondes. A new default, based on a different act or date of default not alleged in the dismissed action, creates a new cause of action. Singleton v. Greymar Assocs., 882 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 2004). Thus, the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of Star Funding’s first foreclosure action does not preclude Star Funding from instituting a new foreclosure action. Id. at 1006. (“[R]es judicata does not prevent mortgagees from foreclosing on a mortgage in successive foreclosure cases when the alleged dates of default are different.”).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.