Rangel v. State
Rangel v. State
101 So. 3d 911; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20195; 2012 WL 5870052
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Rangel v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.