Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Rangel v. State

Rangel v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 21, 2012 · Polen, Taylor
101 So. 3d 911; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20195; 2012 WL 5870052 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Rangel v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not *912revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court’s June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.